Das Verbrauchervertrauen der Uni Michigan (letzte Veröffentlichung für April) ist mit 71,8 etwas weniger schlecht ausgefallen als erwartet (Prognose war 68,0; erste Veröffentlichung war 71,0; Vormonat war 89,1).
Die Einschätzung der aktuellen Lage liegt bei 74,3 (erste Veröffentlichung war 70,0; Vormonat war 103,7)
Die Konsumentenerwartung liegt bei 70,1 (erste Veröffentlichung war 72,4; Vormonat war 85,3)
„April’s final Sentiment Index reading remained largely unchanged from the mid-month figure (+0.8 points), and households with below median incomes expressed the same level of confidence as those with above median incomes (71.9). This merging reflects somewhat larger April declines among households with above median incomes (-19.8 points) compared with those with below median incomes (-14.0). The seven-day moving average of the Index of Consumer Sentiment indicated a second larger improvement that was quickly reversed (see the featured chart); its cause could not be linked to any direct judgements about the coronavirus. The notable divergence between the two main components of the Sentiment Index remained large. The Current Conditions Index fell by 29.4 points in the past month and by 40.5 points in the past two months, whereas the Expectations Index has posted smaller declines of 9.6 points in the past month and 22.0 points from February. While the decline in both indices indicates an ongoing recession, the gap reflects the anticipated cyclical nature of the coronavirus. In the weeks ahead, as several states reopen their economies, more information will reach consumers about how reopening could cause a resurgence in coronavirus infections. Consumers‘ reactions to relaxing restrictions will be critical, either putting further pressure on states to reopen their economies, or exerting added pressure to extend the restrictions even if it has negative consequences for economic prospects. The risks associated with these decisions are not equally balanced, with an incorrect decision to reopen having serious repercussions. The necessity to reimpose restrictions could cause a deeper and more lasting pessimism across all consumers, even those in states that did not relax their restrictions.“
Kommentare lesen und schreiben, hier klicken