Folgen Sie uns


Die Rede von Mario Draghi im Wortlaut – keine Aussagen zur Geldpolitik





Konferenz der EZB und des MIT in Frankfurt

Leider keine Aussagen zur Geldpolitik durch Draghi. Hier die Rede Draghis im Wortlaut:

Moving to the Frontier: Promoting the Diffusion of Innovation
Welcome address by Mario Draghi, President of the ECB,
at the joint conference by the ECB and the MIT Lab for Innovation Science and Policy “Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Euro area”,
Frankfurt am Main, 13 March 2017

It is my pleasure to welcome you to this joint ECB-MIT conference on fostering innovation and entrepreneurship in the euro area.

This might at first glance seem an unusual topic for a central bank conference, since monetary policy principally operates through the demand side of the economy. But the long-term supply picture evidently also affects our ability to deliver on our mandate.

Much of the debate today about the true level of the real equilibrium interest rate, for example, is a debate about the outlook for productivity growth, which of course depends in large part on innovation and entrepreneurship. Higher productivity growth is also vital to safeguard Europe’s economic model of high wages and social protection, and hence to counter the sense of economic insecurity that is currently prevalent in several advanced economies.

But aggregate productivity growth is more than just the development and application of innovation and new technologies which enhance or even revolutionise production processes. New technologies invented elsewhere need to be adapted by firms into their own production processes to make them more efficient. In short, productivity growth depends not only on the creation of new ideas, but also on and their diffusion.

To raise productivity growth, which has slowed in the euro area and in many other economies in recent years, we need to focus on both areas.

There is a lively debate underway as to whether the rate of innovation has slowed or not. Some argue that the great innovations of the past – electricity, railways, etc. – will not be matched in the future,[1] or that we have exhausted the gains from the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) revolution.[2] Others remain more optimistic that the current slowdown in productivity reflects a transition to a knowledge-based economy, and that general purpose technologies such as ICT improve over time and generate complementary innovations.[3]

My view on the topic is that we should not be overly gloomy about the global prospects for innovation, for two reasons.

The first is that we clearly have potential to boost innovative capacity in the euro area. Consider, for example, the persistent gap between R&D spending in Europe and other major advanced economies. According to the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Indicator, only three euro area countries are in the world top ten for innovation.

So if, as the world’s second largest economic area, we were to dismantle barriers to innovative activity in the euro area, it would clearly give a boost to global innovation. I will not go into detail here about what policies this might entail, but clearly government support for innovation matters: in Europe differences in innovative capacity between countries are closely related to public spending on R&D, particularly in basic research.[4]

The second reason why I am reasonably optimistic is that there is no clear evidence yet of a slowdown in innovation. The available data in terms of global R&D spending, and the ongoing historically high rate of high-tech patent registrations, seem to challenge this perception.

Moreover, despite the global slowdown in aggregate productivity, firms at the global productivity frontier have continued to post strong productivity gains over the past decade. The performance of euro area businesses at the global frontier is on a par with businesses in other developed economies, particularly in manufacturing. It is the performance of firms away from the frontier that has been lagging (Charts 1 and 2). Although this is a common feature for all OECD countries, it is particularly the case for euro area services, where productivity growth for the laggard firms has stagnated.

Note: The OECD frontier and non-frontier productivity developments are taken from OECD (2015). Labour productivity growth in the euro area is the unweighted average across Belgium, Finland, France, Italy and Spain of the median firm in each two-digit industry based on CompNet data. Manufacturing industries are then aggregated with value added shares.

Note: The OECD frontier and non-frontier productivity developments are taken from OECD (2015). Labour productivity growth in the euro area is the unweighted average across Belgium, Finland, France, Italy and Spain of the median firm in each two-digit industry based on CompNet data. Service industries are then aggregated with value added shares.

It seems, therefore, that a large contributing factor to the slowdown in aggregate productivity is the second link in the chain: the lack of diffusion of innovation.

This is a long-standing issue for the euro area: better adoption of ICT in the United States appears to explain most of the productivity gap between the US and the EU15 from 1995 to 2007. The contribution to aggregate productivity growth from non-ICT sources of capital deepening and total factor productivity (TFP) growth over that period was broadly equivalent in the two regions.[5]

But what is now becoming clearer is where the diffusion gaps lie. Recent work carried out by the ECB using micro data shows that the difference in productivity between the most productive and the least productive firms in each narrow, two-digit sector is considerable. The top 10 per cent of firms, in terms of productivity, are on average three times more productive than the firms in the bottom 10% (Chart 3). Similar differentials occur in the United States.[6] This massive intra-industry productivity differential dwarfs inter-industry differentials. For comparison, firms active in the tradables sector are on average around 50% more productive than those producing mainly non-tradables.

Notes: According to the AMECO classification, tradable sectors include: manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, transportation and storage, and information and communications technology. Non-tradable sectors include: construction, hotels and restaurants, and professional and administrative services. The within-sector 90th percentile/10th percentile productivity ratio is aggregated to the country level using sector shares in total value added. The “old” EU countries are Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, Portugal and Finland. The “new” EU countries are the Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia.

How, then, can we improve the diffusion of innovation from the frontier to the laggard firms, especially within sectors? Research suggests three main areas that will improve the capacity of, and incentives for, firms to adopt new technology: (i) investing in human capital and managerial ability, (ii) investment in intangibles, and (iii) improving economic dynamism.
Investment in human capital and management

First, there is now an extensive literature on the complementarities between technology and workforce skills, and on how better human capital increases the capacity to absorb technologies. Human capital includes not just formal education, but also on-the-job training and job security – firms with a large proportion of workers on temporary contracts underperform in terms of innovation.

Managerial ability is also key for the adoption of technology. New technologies often require new structures and a reorganisation of production to maximise efficiency gains. While managerial quality is hard to quantify, the existing studies find a statistically strong correlation between a firm’s managerial quality and its total factor productivity. One of the channels through which managerial practices enhance firm performance has been found to be the increased capability of firms to absorb new technologies.

Certainly there is potential to improve education systems in the euro area and thereby to give greater numbers of graduates the necessary technical and scientific skills. Our co-hosts today, MIT, came top of the latest QS world university rankings. There are nine UK universities and two Swiss universities in the top 50 of those rankings, but only one euro area university.

And education is not just for the young. Improving the provision of life-long learning and retraining programmes will aid the flow of skilled labour towards more productive businesses.
Investment in intangibles

Second, numerous studies have shown that firms which invest more in intangibles are in a better position to understand and benefit from new technologies. Such investment includes conducting their own R&D and developing their own intellectual property, as well as investment in branding, software and databases.

Investment in intangibles also appears low in the euro area compared with a number of other advanced economies, although it has been on an upward trend. The aggregate number also masks a wide country-level disparity, with the lack of intangibles investment particularly acute in some countries. Increasing the resources devoted to R&D would improve the ability of euro area firms to absorb more innovation.

Economic dynamism

The third main factor increasing absorptive capacity is the framework in which the business operates. Greater economic dynamism, from competition to higher rates of business entry, plays an important role in incentivising firms to adopt new technology. Ensuring that failed firms are able to smoothly exit the market is also key to enabling capital and labour to be allocated to where it can be more productively used.

Business churn – the combined rate of business formation and closure – has been declining in Europe and the United States since just before the crisis (Chart 4). In lock step with the decline in churn, evidence suggests that capital misallocation has been rising in both regions.

Note: EU14 comprises Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

As an example of barriers to business creation, it takes on average about 10 days to start a new business in the euro area. Depending on the country it can take between four days and almost a month. Yet in the global best performer – New Zealand – it is possible to set up a business in less than a day. There are barriers as well to the orderly exit of firms. Resolving insolvency takes an average of almost two years in the euro area, three times longer than in the best three performing countries.

This is why we talk frequently about the need for structural reforms of regulatory and judicial processes to bolster business dynamism, as well as the need to complete the Single Market. This is especially true in services, where the laggard firms are noticeably behind the frontier.

Of course, creating the right regulatory framework and market conditions to nurture innovation and promote its transformation into new products and processes is complex, and there is no particular established winning formula. But there are a number of countries in the euro area that have proven relatively more successful at putting in place an effective “innovation ecosystem”.

One of the aims of this conference is to investigate international and euro area best practice and facilitate the sharing of that knowledge to countries where an effective ecosystem has yet to be established.

Let me conclude.

There are many reasons why it is a priority today in the euro area to address weak productivity growth. But while some progress can be made in innovation, it is not in my view the sole issue. Equally important for the euro area is to facilitate and encourage the spread of new technology from the frontier to the laggard firms.

Simply by diffusing better the technology we already have in the euro area, we could make sizeable gains in productivity. In other words, there is much we can still do to reverse the aggregate productivity slowdown and dispel pessimism about our future.

Mario Draghi
Foto: EZB

2 Kommentare


  1. Avatar


    13. März 2017 15:12 at 15:12

    Das ist ja jetzt auch mal so garnichts. Den Termin hätte er sich auch sparen können.

  2. Avatar


    13. März 2017 16:37 at 16:37

    Der einzige, der die ganze Zeit pessimistisch ist, ist er doch selber…er redet nur von Krise! dabei ist die Arbeitslosigkeit auf dem Niveau von vor der Krise. Wenn aber keine Krise, dann auch kein QE…also alles schwarz sehen.

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort

Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.

ACHTUNG: Wenn Sie den Kommentar abschicken stimmen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer Daten zur Verwendung der Kommentarfunktion zu.
Weitere Information finden Sie in unserer Zur Datenschutzerklärung


Indiz für die jüngste Zocker-Orgie in US-Aktien und Bitcoin – man schaue auf die Such-Trends

Claudio Kummerfeld



Bunte Kurstafel

Markus Fugmann hatte die letzten Tage darüber berichtet, so auch heute früh (siehe hier). Vor allem über einen gigantischen großen Zocker-Blog auf Reddit (siehe hier) formiert sich quasi täglich neu eine gigantische Crowd aus gierigen Jung-Zockern, um sich auf einzelne US-Aktien zu stürzen. Besonders interessant waren die letzten Tage kräftige Kursanstiege Aktien wie „Gamestop“, bei denen es hohe Short-Volumina gab. Profi-Spekulanten wie Hedgefonds hatten große Wetten auf fallende Kurse aufgebaut. Steigt der Aktienkurs nun aber kräftig, kann der Verlust dieser Profis ins Unendliche steigen.

Und die Banken und Broker, die solchen Hedgefonds oft Kredite für ihre Spekulationen gewähren, könnten kalte Füße kriegen und mehr Sicherheiten verlangen – oder die Short-Positionen zwangsweise schließen, wodurch der Aufwärtssog der Aktien noch mehr verstärkt wird. Auf genau diese Bewegung hofften die Zocker wohl bei Gamestop und anderen Aktien. Man schaue in der folgenden Grafik, wie die Beliebtheit für den Google-Suchbegriff „Short Squeeze“ in den USA in den letzten fünf Jahren aussah. Erst in den letzten Tagen explodierte die Beliebtheit dieses Suchbegriffs extrem. Mit Short Squeeze bezeichnen Börsianer einen stark steigenden Aktienkurs, der durch das Schließen von Short-Positionen verursacht wird. Der Wert 100 in der Grafik steht für die höchste Beliebtheit des jeweiligen Suchbegriffs.

Im folgenden Chart sehen wie in den Google Trends für die letzten fünf Jahre die weltweite Beliebtheit des Suchbegriffs „Bitcoin“. Man sieht, dass bei der ersten großen Hausse Ende 2017 die maximale Beliebtheit von 100 Punkten erreicht wurde, und Anfang diesen Jahres nur ein Wert von 69 – jetzt nur noch 42 Punkte. Die Gier der Internet-Gemeinde nach dem Thema war damals also wohl noch größer als heute. Offenbar scheint sich ganz aktuell die „Meute“ auf die kleinen US-Aktien zu stürzen – weil die wohl von einer Meute Klein-Zocker leichter kräftig im Kurs zu bewegen sind?

Chart zeigt Beliebtheit der Suche nach Bitcoin



Markus Koch LIVE vor dem Handelsstart in New York – Robuste Ergebnisse auf breiter Front





Markus Koch meldet sich im folgenden Video LIVE vor dem Handelsstart in New York. Die gemeldeten und heute Abend anstehenden Quartalszahlen sind heute ein wichtiges Thema.

Hier klicken, um den Inhalt von YouTube anzuzeigen



SAP in der Krise: Ist das eine Chance für uns? – Werbung





Lieber Börsianer,

das war ganz harte Kost, die der europäische Software-Riese SAP am 26. Oktober für seine Aktionäre hatte. Die Cloud-Sparte blieb überraschend deutlich hinter den Erwartungen zurück. Einzelne Anwendungen wie die Software Concur (Verwaltung und Organisation von Geschäftsreisen) floppten völlig. Und noch mehr: Die Walldorfer kassierten auch gleich die Gewinnschätzungen für die nächsten Jahre, wie wir aus dem Quartalsbericht entnehmen mussten.

So kam es wie es kommen musste. Die Aktie des DAX-Schwergewichts kollabierte an jenem Tag binnen weniger Sekunden und verlor 20 % ihres ursprünglichen Marktwertes. Per saldo sank die SAP-Aktie von über 140 Euro unter 100 Euro ab. Milliarden Euro waren plötzlich durch den Schornstein.

Ungefähr im gleichen Zeitraum meldete die US-Konkurrenz bestes Zahlenwerk. Oracle und Salesforce nutzten die Dollarschwäche des vergangenen Jahres und griffen den deutschen Software-Riesen in seinem europäischen Heimatmarkt an. Die Analysten hängten wie üblich ihr Mäntelchen in den Wind und urteilten vernichtend über das Software-Unternehmen. Der Tenor: Eine Wachstumsgeschichte geht zu Ende. SAP bringt es nicht mehr.

In der Tat befindet sich die Walldorfer Software-Schmiede in einer veritablen Krise. So wird der Umsatz 2021 kaum noch wachsen, der Gewinn wird großer Wahrscheinlichkeit sogar rückläufig sein.

Das sind die Stärken der SAP

Aber gemach! SAP ist unverändert ein großartiges Unternehmen, dessen Software-Anwendungen weltweit in rund 25 Branchen genutzt werden. Bei Großunternehmen sind die Deutschen immer noch das Maß aller Dinge. 9 von 10 Playern nutzen mindestens eine kleine SAP-Anwendung. Die Kundenkartei der Walldorfer liest sich imposant. Dort finden Sie typische Traditionsunternehmen wie Chevron, Ford oder AT&T. Aber auch die…..

Wollen Sie meine komplette Analyse lesen?



Meist gelesen 7 Tage